By: Audrey Raymonda John
The Judiciary of Sierra Leone has strongly refuted claims made in a press release issued by the Campaign for Human Rights and Development International (CHRDI) on 23rd May, 2025, describing the publication as malicious, misleading, and factually inaccurate.
While acknowledging the important role civil society organizations play in democratic governance, the Judiciary emphasized that constructive criticism must be grounded in facts, responsible reporting, and a proper understanding of judicial processes.
In its statement, the Judiciary categorically rejected CHRDI’s portrayal of the justice system as failing, citing the release’s claims of “public disillusionment” and systemic failure as unsubstantiated and defamatory.
The Judiciary criticized CHRDI for failing to provide concrete evidence to support serious allegations such as “widespread corruption,” “selective justice,” and “political interference.” These accusations, according to the Judiciary, are speculative and lack credible data or legal backing.
Furthermore, the statement highlighted that CHRDI ignored numerous independent judgments in recent years that have demonstrated the Judiciary’s impartiality, even when dealing with powerful individuals.
Contrary to CHRDI’s claims, the Judiciary detailed a number of ongoing reforms initiated under the leadership of His Lordship, Chief Justice Komba Kamanda, over the past 200 days.
The Judiciary stressed its constitutionally guaranteed independence, asserting that all judges are appointed through legal and transparent procedures. Any allegations of misconduct are handled by the Judicial and Legal Service Commission, not by civil society groups or media speculation.
The suggestion that the Judiciary operates under political influence was described as both unfounded and dangerous, as it undermines public trust and the principle of separation of powers.
While acknowledging that no institution is without challenges, the Judiciary reaffirmed its commitment to transparency, reform, and accountability. It has welcomed both internal and external audits, strengthened disciplinary mechanisms, and maintained open-door policies with civil society and development partners.
The Judiciary extended an invitation to CHRDI and other CSOs to engage inconstructive dialogue, participate in public forums, and contribute meaningfully to ongoing reforms.
“We are not opposed to critique,” the statement read. “But such critiques must be evidence-based, constructive, and acknowledge institutional progress.”
The Judiciary concluded by urging citizens, media, and international partners to support reform through informed engagement, not misinformation.
“The resilience of our democratic institutions including the Judiciary depends on a responsible and informed citizenry,” stated Chief Justice Komba Kamanda.
While admitting that challenges persist, he reiterated his commitment to building a transparent, accountable, and trusted judicial system that would be an envy within the Sub-region.